Renewal of terms in the course of the administrative proceeding as the court’s discretionary powers

Вантажиться...
Ескіз

Дата

DOI

Науковий ступінь

Рівень дисертації

Шифр та назва спеціальності

Рада захисту

Установа захисту

Науковий керівник/консультант

Члени комітету

Назва журналу

Номер ISSN

Назва тому

Видавець

Національний науковий центр «Інститут судових експертиз ім. Засл. проф. М.С. Бокаріуса»

Анотація

The article studies scientific and professional approaches to defining the concept of discretionary powers. Additionally, to define this concept, legal regulations of the European Union have been considered. To analyze the definition for discretionary powers in the administrative proceeding, the authors use the practices of the European Court of Human Rights and the national court, specifically the Supreme Court as part of the Cassation Administrative Court. In this scientific research, the domestic legislation concerning the legal nature of courts’ discretionary powers in administrative proceedings has been analyzed. Procedural law norms are studied in terms of legal regulation of terms in an administrative proceeding, consequences of their omission for a party, and the mechanism for their renewal are considered. The courts’ discretionary powers to renew terms during administrative proceedings are outlined. The understanding of the practical implementation of the court’s discretionary powers during the renewal of procedural terms in the course of an administrative proceeding is studied, and the practical problematics of the mentioned subject matter is analyzed through the prism of the established national judicial practice.

Опис

still undergoing reforms, where administrative proceedings, without exaggeration, can be considered one of the primary means of protecting rights and interests of natural persons and legal entities in the area of publiclaw relations from violations by authorities. This protection should take place “…through fair, unbiased, and timely consideration of cases”1 . Improving administrative procedure in Ukraine will contribute to: introduction of additional guarantees for natural persons and legal entities for a fair trial; overcoming the fragmentation of the judiciary; ensuring optimization and unification of judicial procedures by both ordinary and specialized courts at all stages and at all levels in accordance with European standards. To uphold the above-mentioned provisions, it is advisable to consider the issue of the practical implementation of the court’s discretionary powers, which directly affect the fair, unbiased, and timely consideration of cases. Furthermore, it should be stressed that the relevance of the research topic arises from the absence of a legislative definition concerning the grounds and conditions for renewing missed terms in administrative proceedings. There is a need for scientific and practical research regarding the court’s practical exercise of discretionary powers during renewal of procedural terms, identification of challenges, and ways to address them.

Ключові слова

public-law dispute, administrative proceeding, procedural terms, court’s powers, discretionary powers, justice, rights protection

Бібліографічний опис

Moroz S., Riabchenko O., (2023). Renewal of terms in the course of the administrative proceeding as the court’s discretionary powers. Archives of Criminology and Forensic Sciences. 1 (7). 100-106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32353/acfs.7.2023.08. P. 7.

Підтвердження

Рецензія

Додано до

Згадується в