Renewal of terms in the course of the administrative proceeding as the court’s discretionary powers
Вантажиться...
Дата
Автори
DOI
Науковий ступінь
Рівень дисертації
Шифр та назва спеціальності
Рада захисту
Установа захисту
Науковий керівник/консультант
Члени комітету
Назва журналу
Номер ISSN
Назва тому
Видавець
Національний науковий центр «Інститут судових експертиз ім. Засл. проф. М.С. Бокаріуса»
Анотація
The article studies scientific and professional approaches to
defining the concept of discretionary powers. Additionally, to define this
concept, legal regulations of the European Union have been considered.
To analyze the definition for discretionary powers in the administrative
proceeding, the authors use the practices of the European Court of Human
Rights and the national court, specifically the Supreme Court as part of the
Cassation Administrative Court.
In this scientific research, the domestic legislation concerning the legal
nature of courts’ discretionary powers in administrative proceedings has
been analyzed. Procedural law norms are studied in terms of legal regulation
of terms in an administrative proceeding, consequences of their omission for
a party, and the mechanism for their renewal are considered.
The courts’ discretionary powers to renew terms during administrative
proceedings are outlined. The understanding of the practical implementation
of the court’s discretionary powers during the renewal of procedural terms
in the course of an administrative proceeding is studied, and the practical
problematics of the mentioned subject matter is analyzed through the prism
of the established national judicial practice.
Опис
still undergoing reforms, where administrative proceedings, without
exaggeration, can be considered one of the primary means of protecting
rights and interests of natural persons and legal entities in the area of publiclaw relations from violations by authorities. This protection should take place
“…through fair, unbiased, and timely consideration of cases”1
. Improving
administrative procedure in Ukraine will contribute to: introduction of
additional guarantees for natural persons and legal entities for a fair trial;
overcoming the fragmentation of the judiciary; ensuring optimization and
unification of judicial procedures by both ordinary and specialized courts at
all stages and at all levels in accordance with European standards. To uphold the above-mentioned provisions, it is advisable to consider the issue of the
practical implementation of the court’s discretionary powers, which directly
affect the fair, unbiased, and timely consideration of cases. Furthermore, it
should be stressed that the relevance of the research topic arises from the
absence of a legislative definition concerning the grounds and conditions
for renewing missed terms in administrative proceedings. There is a need
for scientific and practical research regarding the court’s practical exercise
of discretionary powers during renewal of procedural terms, identification of
challenges, and ways to address them.
Ключові слова
public-law dispute, administrative proceeding, procedural terms, court’s powers, discretionary powers, justice, rights protection
Бібліографічний опис
Moroz S., Riabchenko O., (2023). Renewal of terms in the course of the administrative
proceeding as the court’s discretionary powers. Archives of Criminology and Forensic
Sciences. 1 (7). 100-106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32353/acfs.7.2023.08. P. 7.
